110下學期國際租稅與跨國購併專題期末報告安排 (Final Terms of INTERNATIONAL TAXATION AND CROSSBORDER M&A 2022 Spring)

Assignments for each Group: 各組分派主題

  1. Group A: GSK vs. IRS A組:葛萊素對美國國稅局TP案
  2. Group B: The attractions and costs of having an investment structure in tax haven B組:租稅天堂擁有投資架構的吸引力與對應成本。
  3. Group C: FATF Money Laundering Cases either of covid related or real property C組:FATF與肺炎相關或不動產交易相關的洗錢個案分析
  4. Group D: comparison between different tax haven blacklists D組:試比較各種不同的稅務黑名單

 

Group A: GSK vs. IRS over PSM application  A組:葛萊素對美國國稅局利潤分割法之TP案

Assignments:

  • summarize the facts of this case個案事實簡介
  • summarize the issues and arguements of both sides 徵納雙方爭議簡析
  • summarize analysis and comments of the below two articles: 1. A European View on Transfer Pricing After Glaxo 2. TRANSFER PRICING SEVEN YEARS AFTER GLAXO SMITH KLINE 以下兩份文獻的分析與整理
  • summarize what does GSK say for its tax policy now? 簡述葛萊素藥廠現在的稅務政策

References:

  • IRS Accepts Settlement Offer in Largest Transfer Pricing Dispute: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-news/ir-06-142.pdf
  • GSK tax-strategy
  • A European View on Transfer Pricing After Glaxo: PUB_TP_after_Glaxo_TP1536
  • TRANSFER PRICING SEVEN YEARS AFTER GLAXO SMITH KLINE:swer 14 Burnett

Group B: The attractions and costs of having an investment structure in tax haven B組:租稅天堂擁有投資架構的吸引力與對應成本。

Assignments: Country by Country summarize the tax topics 針對三個稅務避風港國家比照彼此稅務的主題

  1. selected Countries to be summarized
    • Either Luxembourg or Netherlands 荷蘭或盧森堡選一個
    • Either Dubai or Abu Dhabi 杜拜或阿布達比選一個
    • Either Belize, Samoa or Mauritius 貝里斯、薩摩亞或模里西斯選一個
  2. tax topics comparison
    • Tax principle: Residential Principle or Territorial Principle 屬地主義或屬人主義
    • Corporate Taxation: tax rates, tax base and deductibles and withholding tax  企業所得稅概述,如稅率、稅基、扣除項目與扣繳稅款。
    • Preferential Tax Regime 是否有稅捐優惠方案
    • Substance Requirement 是否有經濟實質的要求,如有內容為何?

Group C: FATF Money Laundering Cases either of covid related or real property C組:FATF與肺炎相關或不動產交易相關的洗錢個案分析

Group C choose either topic to present, especially the cases given by FATF. C組請選擇以下議題之一,尤其要報告多類洗錢案例。

  1.  COVID-19-related Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 與新冠肺炎相關的洗錢與資恐行為
  2. MONEY LAUNDERING & TERRORIST FINANCING THROUGH THE REAL ESTATE SECTOR 透過不動產進行的洗錢與資恐行為

參考資料:

ML and TF through the Real Estate Sector

Update-COVID-19-Related-Money-Laundering-and-Terrorist-Financing-Risks

Group D: comparison between different tax haven blacklists D組:試比較各種不同的稅務黑名單

Please compare the content, purposes methodology and perspectives applied in the following tax haven blacklists. 請比較以下各種稅務黑名單的主旨、內容以及編輯的方法論、觀點

  1. Introducing every aspects of Tax Haven: EU Briefing 簡介歐盟對於稅務天堂所會涉及的問題層面: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/147404/7%20-%2001%20EPRS-Briefing-621872-Listing-tax-havens-by-the-EU-FINAL.PDF
  2. EU black and gray list of tax haven 簡述歐盟現行黑名單與灰名單,以及揀選名單的判斷標準,以及有意見認為如何處理歐盟境內的稅務天堂
    • EU list: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-list-of-non-cooperative-jurisdictions/
    • EU’s criteria: https://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/EU-List-Tax-Havens-Progress-Challenges-ECDPM-Discussion-Paper-310-2021.pdf
    • how to fix EU’s tax haven list: https://www.greens-efa.eu/opinions/spot-the-tax-haven-avoiding-the-blacklist-is-a-game-for-zero-tax-countries/
  3. Tax Justice Network 租稅正義網絡編制的兩項稅務天堂指數
    • 企業稅務天堂指數,其內容與方法Corporate Tax Haven Index – 2021 Results: https://taxjustice.net/reports/the-state-of-tax-justice-2021/
    • 財務隱匿指數,其內容與方法Financial Secrecy Index – 2020 Results:  https://fsi.taxjustice.net/en/
  4. 樂施會對歐盟租稅天堂的批評Oxfam’s criticism on EU’s tax haven list: https://www.oxfam.org/en/tags/tax-havens

 

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *